For obvious reasons, extensive testing is crucial for the production of high-quality electrical components. PCB fabrication is no exception because the seamless operation of circuit boards is what ensures the performance of all the electronics in the first place.
Let’s deepen into all the industrial methods of PCB testing which are valid and are widely used as of 2022.
Quality Assurance of sub-products, finished components, and the technology of fabrication at each stage of production is of great importance. The reason is that without careful testing, the risks of a high percentage or entire batches of malfunctioning PCBs increase drastically.
Typical consequences of neglecting PCB testing are failures and defects in all the electronics produced. It absolutely leads to customer dissatisfaction, deterioration of brand image, and other issues that are extremely hard to resolve afterward.
Technically, entire PCB testing can be divided into manual and automated and electrical testing of both the laminated materials and the following components:
So, the PCB testing is essential for ensuring the required-quality laminate materials and mounted components as well as their assembly.
Let’s take a brief look at the actual benefits of having solid QA departments and robust methodologies in practice:
Apparently, you have all the reasons to have the best Quality Assurance practices integrated.
Now let’s pay close attention to existing types of PCB testing.
Quick note: you may have several key ones integrated into the production process (manual ones, or others that are done by machines installed as a part of the manufacturing line). Yet, you must have a QA department with other equipment units for testing included.
Alternatively, you may send small selections of PCBs for testing in an independent QA agency to get the appropriate certification. Most likely, you will have to opt for both options.
It’s simply manual testing when a technician uses a magnifier and its bare eyes to inspect a small selection of PCBs for visible defects. These may include solder defects, scratches, missing components, board stains, etc. This inspection method is an absolute must-have in place.
Pros:
Cons:
It’s that type of testing considered the most reliable and robust one, though nearly the most expensive. Which, actually, depends on board size, design complexity, and other factors.
ICT is more known as a bed-of-nails test. It’s powering up and actuating the individual circuity on the board. The “screening” ensures like 85-90% coverage of the board’s entire circuit pattern. This way, you are already 85-90% free of human error.
The test’s working principles include the use of fixed probes that are mounted in a way that matches the PCB design. These check the integrity of the solder connection. So, the “bed of nails” is actually the composition of probes on which a PCB lies.
Actually, the access points that are normally predesigned on all the industrial PCBs serve exactly this test execution. They ensure the connection of probes with the circuit. It’s hardly possible to physically put probes under each connection (that’s why 85-90% coverage instead of 100% coverage), but the core joints can be tested successfully.
As you may have already understood, you should have design-for-manufacturing in place in order for this test to be even possible to execute (in another way, you just did not plan access points).
Strengths of the method:
Weaknesses of the method:
The flying needle testing is seen as a modification or an improvement of ICT. In this method, there is no need for a power supply. A flying probe machine can access test points, untented vias, and the ends of components.
It additionally can be programmed to check the value of passive parts. This way it allows for testing individual elements, including shorts, opens, and diodes, and distinct indications such as capacitance, resistance, and inductance. Tailor-made fixtures and design changes are of no need here.
Strengths of the method:
Weaknesses of the method:
Such a method is technically the automation of the manual one described at the beginning of the post. Its working principle is the use of single (2D) or two (3D) cameras to take images of PCBs in high resolution. These are then verified against validated images of PCBs that passed testing successfully. Any deviations are detected.
An AOI machine is preferably a part of the manufacturing line serving as the method of rejecting sub-quality PCBs in the first place. It’s more like a primary line of Quality Assurance.
The AOI method includes all the checks that can be performed manually. It includes some others as well. AOI machine performs all of those with greater accuracy as it can detect components placed nanometers off the required location. See what an image taken from a PCB looks like in the image below.
Strengths of the method:
Weaknesses of the method:
This method is unique on its own level. AXI technology is based on the penetration of a PCB and its components with radio waves to generate a 2D/3D image of the solder joints and underside pads. AXI is perfect for testing hidden joints and can detect issues optical methods fail to find.
AXI can hardly be integrated in the way it’s a part of the manufacturing line. Yet, it can be used alongside the production process. QA engineers may use it on a small selection of PCBs from each batch to find defects early on.
In such a manner a manufacturer can spot the need to make adjustments in a timely manner. This drastically reduces the number of costly repairs. X-Ray inspection is more well-justified for parts with hidden pads.
Strengths of the method:
Weaknesses of the method:
This form of testing is normally implemented in the final stage of PCB fabrication. It is more like a final quality control procedure. Its working principle is making the device under test (DUT) with a PCB undergo a set of checks. Just to ensure that it functions as intended.
The specificity of the functional testing is that it can be simple as an on-off power test. But it can be complex as a comprehensive test with strict protocols and with the use of testing software involved.
FCT can serve as a substitute for other testing procedures. It simulated the actual operating environment for a DUT. From this perspective, FCT is one of the most straightforward methods. In the real world, 100% functional testing is becoming increasingly prevalent, especially for small batches of expensive circuits. Just to make sure that each product is operational.
Take a look at how this testing may be performed in the image below.
Strengths of the method:
Weaknesses of the method:
This form of testing somewhat complements the functional one. Its working principle is checking the performance under conditions exceeding the ones predicted for the normal operating environment. It helps to quickly determine hidden defects.
Burn-in testing does not only check for indicators of potential failure and test load capacity. It simulates extreme conditions to provoke failures. Some operation conditions are increased temperature, voltage, current, operating frequency, physical stress, if necessary, and others. The collected data helps to determine if a PCB can survive in a real-world environment.
Strengths of the method:
Weaknesses of the method:
Besides testing a DUT under normal operating conditions or under artificially caused stresses, there are other types of checks.
These include:
They are rather optional but still may be required by some customers or authorities that issue certification.
Strengths of the methods:
Weaknesses of the methods:
In essence, every manufacturer receives way more benefits from having solid Quality Assurance and PCB testing in place rather than neglecting them. This is a simple dependency: the better PCB testing is = the better brand image and business profitability.
Among types of testing that are impossible to go without are: visual inspection, automated optical inspection, and functional circuit testing. Others may be outsourced to QA agencies and authorities that issue certifications.
Need any help with PCB or PCBA manufacturing? Contact us now.